Now, a new wave of potential actions aimed at Kaspersky as an additional means of punishing Moscow over the war adds even more pressure on the already beleaguered company. In March, after Eugene Kaspersky tweeted that he hoped Ukrainians and Russians could “compromise,” as the Russians were bombing civilian targets, and many security researchers questioned why the company was protecting Russian military web assets from DDoS attacks, industry and government leaders worldwide again questioned whether it could be trusted. Indeed, the company founded in 1989 has hundreds of millions of users worldwide and a track record of producing some of the most important cybersecurity research over the past three decades, often exposing Russian cyber operations against American interests.īut the Ukraine war has given Kaspersky critics even more ammunition. Its founder, Eugene Kaspersky, regularly denied his antivirus company was doing the bidding of the Russian government. and Britain and mounting suspicions of links to Russian intelligence services, Moscow’s most famous cybersecurity company, Kaspersky, managed to persevere. It does not store any personal data.Despite suffering years of government bans in the U.S. The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. Kaspersky said statistics provided by users to the company can be processed on the Kaspersky Security Network’s services located in various countries around the world, including Canada and Germany. War isn’t good for anyone,” the company said. “We believe that peaceful dialogue is the only possible instrument for resolving conflicts. The cybersecurity company added that they believe in transparency and that continued implementation of concrete measures to demonstrate their enduring commitment to integrity and trustworthiness to their customers is the most important thing to them. We will continue to assure our partners and customers in the quality and integrity of our products, and we will be working with the BSI for clarification on its decision and for the means to address its and other regulators’ concerns,” Kaspersky said in a statement. “We believe this decision is not based on a technical assessment of Kaspersky products – that we continuously advocated for with the BSI and across Europe – but instead is being made on political grounds. However, Kaspersky said it is a private-owned company and has no ties to the Russian government whatsoever and BSI is politically motivated. Reuters reported that Germany’s Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) also warned users of the antivirus software, saying the company could be coerced by Russian government agents to hack IT systems abroad.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |